Skip to main content

Foundations of Inclusive Practice Course Reflection Fall 2018


Sabra Hawkes
12/16/18
Inclusive Practice
Final Course Reflection
Guiding question: How can we design for inclusion?

Foundations of Inclusive Practice gave me the opportunity to study the practices of managing and understanding learning environments that include students who have disabilities, special needs, and general differences than their peers in school and create a space where they could be included in learning.
Throughout the semester we did several projects that helped solidify our learning in what it entails to teach a student with a learning disability or learning difference. The Least Restrictive Environment assignment quite honestly introduced me to what LRE was. I hadn’t heard this term prior to this class but after the lectures and assignment surrounding it, its quite clear, include students in as much general education as possible. That will look different for each student but be sure they are included as much as possible while still learning.  
The mock TEAM meeting was my favorite assignment. I felt is was the most hands on assignment and I could see such value in it.  I’m sure, as a future educator, I will be involved in an IEP meeting at some point throughout my career. In my group I was assigned the special educator, while, I don’t plan to be in special education in the future because of this assignment I got to see that the special educator takes on a lot, especially in an IEP meeting. They are responsible for having expertise in the disability laws and regulations, they do much more than are given credit for. In a standard IEP meeting, a team is chosen, they are a legally mandated group of decision makers, who as a group, determine eligibility for Special Education. They set goals and services, they determine classroom placement and draft an IEP for a student with a disability. They run an initial meeting, an annual meeting and a revaluation meeting, The group consist of a few different people; the parent, the Special Education teacher, the General Education teacher, the student (If they are over 18 or if becomes applicable), a person who can interpret the results of the assessment and a person who is authorized to spend money, as IEP meeting typically come down to funding.
From this mock meeting I learned how an IEP meeting typically runs. It usually behind with the Special Educator making introductions and opening remarks, then moves on to the parents voicing concerns, the school based professional updates on progress, the interventions are decided on and finally, the IEP is written.
The Universal Design Project, that required us to modify a lesson plan by stuffing as much Universal Design into it as possible, helped me solidify what it is, its not just changing a building to make it inclusive but it is including multiple means of representation, multiple means of expression, and multiple means of engagement. Giving students the opportunity to receive information in a variety of different ways, allowing students to express their knowledge not just in a form of a paper but maybe also in a song, or piece of art and lastly, allowing students to be a part of their learning. Giving students choices in what they learn will help engage and solidify learning in children. I once had a professor ask me, of all the classes you’ve taken in your lifetime, how many of them were you actively engaged in? My answer was “Very few. I usually tried hard just for a good grade.” That’s a problem, we nee active engagement in schools, students to have choices in how they show content knowledge because not everyone learns and shows understanding in the same way.
Beyond just the out of class assignments, the content was extremely relevant and corresponded to my other classes quite well. For example, while learning about IDEA, and FAPE, and IEP’s we were also discussing those topics in my other classes just in a different context. This helped reiterate the material and made it easier to grasp.
Speaking of IEP’s prior to this class, I didn’t realize all the restrictions that went into simply obtaining an IEP for a student. For example, to obtain an IEP, there needs to be the presence of a disability and that disability must fall within a specified category, like Cerebral Palsy. The student must show adverse effects from that disability in order to obtain an IEP. If a student has Type 1 diabetes that “disability” doesn’t necessarily impact their ability to learn outside of more trips to the nurse to check blood sugar. Along with the presence of a disability, adverse effects, a student also needs to have a need for specialized instruction. Students who do not meet this criterion and are not IEP eligible can consider a 504 plan or an Independent Education Evaluation.
Understanding the difference between accommodations and modifications was a useful piece that came from this class. Prior to I had interchanged the two words. Now, I understand when an instructor makes an accommodation for a student, they are making changes to the routine of running the classroom but does not change the curricular expectations. For example, A student taking extra time on a test does not change the content they are being tested on, it simply accommodates for a slower processing speed. The student needs more time to read and process their thoughts about each question. Whereas, a modification does change the routine of the classroom and does change the curriculum for the student who needs that modification. An example, having a student choose to answer two out of five essay questions instead of all five like requested of the other students. Why give these options to students? Offer the least restrictive environment and give work at a level for success.
            1:1 service was another topic discussed which I found most prevalent for a few reasons. One, I knew many students in middle and high school with 1:1 support service who certainly did not need that kind of intervention and later in life I worked at a mental health agency with a few clients who were accustomed to 1:1 support service who were more than capable to do many things on their own. According to our class notes, 1:1 service is students have an aide assigned to them. That 1:1 can be a behavior interventionist, can be a nurse for individuals with medical needs or a scribe, braille, or signer if the student is hearing or visually impaired. As discussed in class, how many services and how much of each service is necessary? It’s recommended that the minimum amount for the student to make progress. Going back to my earlier years, I know that my clients were capable of so much more than one, they got credit for and two, or even got to show. Many times, my clients would look to me for an answer when being spoken to. Funny story: I took a client to a job interview and as their support person, I was invited into the interview, even though I protested many times, I eventually, reluctantly went in.  Each time the interviewer asked my client a question they would instantly look to me for the answer. Even a question such as, “Why would you like to work for us”? The client looked to me. While, I’m not blaming my client, I understood why they did this. They were so accustomed to not needing to think for themselves, they had every question answered for every want met instantly. This is a great example of too many (unnecessary) services and too much of each service. There was certainly not an increase in inclusion or independence in many of my client’s high school experiences, until I came along and demanded that of them.
            While I struggle with the overuse of 1:1 service for students. I see tremendous value in the correct time and place. There are 1:1 service, as I described earlier as well as direct services.  Direct services are services delivered in a separate space outside of a general education classroom. An example of this would be a resource room. Direct service services include speech and language services, physical therapy or adapted Physical Education, counseling services, or separate curriculum programs. Along with 1:1 service, direct service there is another service called Inclusive Services, theses are as they sound, they are services delivered in a General Education setting with accommodations and modifications for the student as their team sees fit. In Inclusive service, there is in-class small group support, as well as in-class technological support, along with co-teaching; a paraprofessional and a General Education teacher. To me, Inclusive services are the least restrictive environment, but I must remember, its only least restrictive if they’re learning.
            This class was informative and relevant to my future as an educator. We examined the different ways of providing services for students with special needs and differences in the way they learn within a school. Between the in-class lectures, the discussions, the projects and the in-school observations, I feel I have a better grasp on how to best help my future students.

Comments